More Evidence: HD TV is a Set Up for Mind Control

A. True Ott, PhD  |  Educate Yourself.org 65,056 views
January 30, 2009

To begin with, take 10 minutes and watch this 60 Minutes video. Leslie Stahl makes some very interesting comments on the morality and ethics of mind-control. Here are mine:

1. The technology called FMRI (Functional Magnetic Resonance) is old and archaic actually. Mengele and others were “reading” brain waves via magnetic resonance graphing in the early 70’s. Boston-Logan Airport is already using new light-wave beams to scan and read air traveler’s intentions before they board the planes. 

2. The German individual Stahl interviewed was very hesitant to reveal exactly who had the mind-reading technology today. Again, just look at the U.S. Patents issued in the last decade to realize the height and breadth of the mind-control explosion — and keep in mind that patents are usually applied for after the technology has been proven to be commercially viable via working models.

3. The FMRI “computer” that “reads the mind” is just one side of the coin. It is much, much easier to produce emotions and impulses into the brain than to actually read the brain via computer programs.

4. This technology needs much more bandwidth space than is currently provided by analog signals in order to be implemented. Thus, the need to switch to digital signals exclusively.

5. This technology, in the wrong hands, is a bigger threat to individual freedom than any standing army.
 
6. Is Homeland Security the “wrong hands”? Why is this just now beginning to be reported by such news programs as “60 Minutes”?

Read this patent abstract, and then read my exposé on digital TV once again in the context of Stahl’s report.

USP # 6,488,617 (December 3, 2002)

Title: Nervous System Manipulation by EM Fields from Monitors.

Issued to: Loos, Hendricus.

Abstract: Physiological effects have been observed in a human subject in response to stimulation of the skin with weak electromagnetic fields that are pulsed with certain frequencies near 1/2 Hz or 2.4 Hz, such as to excite a sensory resonance.

Many computer monitors and HD TV screens, when displaying pulsed images, emit pulsed electromagnetic fields of sufficient amplitudes to cause such excitation. It is therefore possible to manipulate the nervous system of a subject by pulsing images displayed on a nearby computer monitor or DIGITAL TV set. For the latter, the image pulsing may be embedded in the program material, or it may be overlaid by modulating a video stream, either as an RF signal or as a video signal.

The image displayed on a computer monitor may be pulsed effectively by a simple computer program.

For certain monitors, pulsed electromagnetic fields capable of exciting sensory resonances in nearby subjects may be generated even as the displayed images are pulsed with subliminal intensity.

Filed under: Articles, News · Tags: , ,

14 comments

  1. Lance says:
    March 2, 2009 at 15:19

    Concerning this technology ‘in the wrong hands’, just who or what should be in control of this kind of technology? Humans? Dangerous in the very least no matter who it is! Humanistica artificial intelligence act in a ‘god-like’ manner? An abomination with desolating consequences!

  2. Nanker Phelge says:
    March 3, 2009 at 03:02

    This technology already is in the wrong hands. it will be great when the Illuminati are ousted and flabby overpaid boffins like these guys can get proper jobs like sweeping the streets etc

  3. Don Amero says:
    March 3, 2009 at 18:42

    If mind reading technology is truly capable of gleaning
    information from one’s mind,
    why did the military resort to torture in Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo?

    Why not just scan their minds for information? Oh, it doesn’t read Arabic yet. Sure.

    I seriously doubt they can control or extract language
    from your mind.

    At best, generic patterns that
    can only be inferred.

    Inadmissible I say. Strike it
    from the record. Take the results of a polygraph test. Polygraphs have never been proven to be accurate or reliable. It is merely a tool for intimidation and coercion.
    This is why polygraph results
    are not admissible as evidence.

    If they really could read or control your mind? Just think
    of baseball, Richard Nixon, or Margaret Thatcher naked on a cold day.

    Should blow a fuse or two in their circuitry.

  4. TheParadigmShift says:
    March 3, 2009 at 19:33

    All politicians should have this device pointed at their heads at all times!!!

    Find out what Bush and Cheney know about 9/11…

  5. john says:
    March 5, 2009 at 23:15

    one word: psychopaths

    They would infect us all with their need to control because they are so lacking within themselves of even the most basic common decency, which they are constantly trying to subvert. A psychopath is a husk of a man with no inner center or empathy for others. This describes the people who implement these intrusions. They need to find criminality in order to justify their abuses. How else are they going to bring in their totalitarian world dictatorship?

  6. admin says:
    March 5, 2009 at 23:37

    They will bring everything we allow them to, or rather, what we agree with, or even better, what we sheepfully swallow.

    I’m now finishing the second issue of The Dot Connector magazine. Release date 15th March. If you liked the premier issue, John, you will love the second: https://www.thedotconnector.org.

  7. Dondo says:
    March 9, 2009 at 01:21

    The real question is WHY. Why would anyone seeking to be ‘free’ and human even consider this tech? Unless, of course, they are already brainwashed. The best thing would be to have this planet completely destroyed, saving the universe and not giving these ‘elite’ (puke) any wishes. What f’n tyrants.

  8. admin says:
    March 9, 2009 at 11:07

    Funny what you say, Dondo: destroy the Earth to save the sky above it! 😉 Would there be sky then?

  9. Jeffrey Charles Archer says:
    March 31, 2009 at 03:49

    This is why I hope and pray for a giant solar flare just big enough to wipe out all the world’s computers. I do enjoy the ease of access the internet offers, and so forth, but the implications of a Brave New World/1984 type of reality is so abhorent, I’d much rather see these technologies end.

  10. Trent says:
    April 29, 2009 at 06:25

    My take on this switch is that they want the analog signals for police and military and the coming of robotics to police the people.

  11. Gary says:
    May 5, 2009 at 03:13

    Your observations are correct. It is quite typical that, by the time something is mentioned in the corporate controlled media, it has already been done, usually years or even decades ago. We are being purposely mislead about the state of technological advancements and it is being released fro our consumption at a later date, only to acclimate us to the idea of its use. This is because it is intended to be used against us all.

  12. jani says:
    June 13, 2009 at 17:47

    I was in mind control program

  13. dave says:
    December 18, 2010 at 19:58

    no need for big scanner, the actual technology is far more advanced than this and is being used in the U.S. actively pre-9/11, it has already begun

  14. Elizabeth Renee Gingerich says:
    April 17, 2016 at 01:18

    Interesting AND SCARY….