Che! Sanctification of a Ruthless Killer
Americans cannot expect to avoid destruction as long as they continue to embrace Communism in all its myriad disguises. Symptomatic of the problem is a four hour seventeen minute biopic of Soviet Comintern agent and terrorist Che Guevara. Rather than make movies about genuine American heroes, Hollywood is celebrating people dedicated to the destruction of Western civilization.
Movie critic Mick Lasalle of the San Francisco Chronicle cannot understand why director Steven Soderbergh made the movie:
“If Soderbergh made as idol-worshiping an epic about George Washington or Abraham Lincoln — actual heroes with tangible, positive legacies — people would gag at the naive treatment. Instead of making the case for Guevara as a hero, Soderbergh just assumes we all agree. The movie is the communist guerrilla version of the Stations of the Cross, in which we see Guevara at various stages, enduring various hardships. The invitation is not to think but to admire, and maybe to worship.”
This is not the first time Hollywood has presented this ruthless killer as a saint. In 1969, Omar Sharif played “the most controversial rebel of our time” with Jack Palance as Castro. Then, there was The Motorcycle Diaries in 2004 and at least a half dozen made-for-TV lms.
Communists always present their demented drive for world domination in terms of serving the common people. Surprisingly, plenty of suckers are ready to swallow this bait. But, why do these dupes include the US corporate media establishment?
The explanation
The US mass media and most of its corporations are controlled by the central banking cartel, i.e., the Rothschilds, Warburgs, Rockefellers, etc. These are the same people who sponsor Communism.
The guiding principle behind all world events is their plan to translate their monopoly over government credit into a world monopoly of power, wealth, culture and religion.
These bankers use a Hegelian dialectic to achieve their end. They created both Capitalism and Communism as thesis and antithesis.
Their aim is a synthesis, combining the political and cultural tyranny of Communism with the appearance of Capitalist free markets. China or even Cuba may be the end model for the New World Order.
In 1953, Ford Foundation President, H. Rowan Gaither told Congressional Investigator Norman Dodd that his instructions were to use “our grant-making power so to alter life in the United States that it can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.”
This is why the Communist Party term “political correctness” has become part of our everyday lexicon. This is why the elite media and foundations promote feminism, homosexuality, pornography and promiscuity to destabilize society. Why they sponsor “diversity” to undermine American identity. Why the culture industries are dedicated to sex, violence, alienation, deviance and the occult. We’ll never know what we are missing in terms of cultural works that boost our sense of who we are and where we should be going.
Eustace Mullins relates this story: Early in his career, a New York publisher (who are all banker controlled) told his agent that it’s too bad Mullins had decided to go against them. Look at the success they arranged for such “high school” talents as Hemingway, Steinbeck and Faulkner. Unfortunately, Mullins would be consigned to the wilderness.
Such anecdotes confirm that we have been dispossessed and prepared for servitude. Our culture, most of our assumptions about the world, are controlled by the central bankers.
Guevara, Castro and the Cuban revolution
Fidel Castro came to power in Cuba only because of the covert help of New World Orderlies in the US State Department and mass media. They cut off arm sales to Batista while at the same time allowing Castro to be supplied, partly by Russian submarines. This told the Cuban military which way the wind was blowing and they quietly defected.
This is the conclusion of Nataniel Weyl in Red Star Over Cuba (1962). Weyl was a Communist in the 1930s and knew the top leaders of the Cuban Communist Party. He actually worked for the central bankers at one time, as Latin American research chief for the Federal Reserve System. He is one of many Jews who recognized Communism as a dangerous ruse and devoted his life to exposing Comintern subversion in Latin America.
Weyl says that both Ernesto Guevara and Fidel Castro were cultivated and trained as Soviet agents as teenagers. Guevara, an Argentine, was liaison between the Soviet espionage network and the Castro forces who masqueraded as an indigenous force. In fact, they were large bankrolled and supplied by the Soviet Union.
“Fidel’s secret weapon was money — incredible millions of dollars, with which he bought ‘victories.’ He bought entired regiments from Batista’s ofcers and, on one occasion, purchased for $650,000 cash an entired armored train, with tanks, guns, ammunition, jeeps and 500 men” (p. 141).
According to Humberto Fantova’s Che! Hollywood’s Favorite Tyrant, Guevara was involved in the execution of 10,000 Cubans after the revolution. He was “a bloodthirsty executioner, a military bumbler, a coward, and a hypocrite. This biographical account proves it’s no exaggeration to state that Che — who was captured and killed nearly forty years ago – was the godfather of modern terrorism. And yet Che’s followers naively swallow Castro’s historical revisionism. They are classic ‘useful idiots’ — the name Stalin gave to foolish Westerners who parroted his lies about communism’s successes.”
Nat Hentoff met Che at the United Nations and asked “this idealist”: “Can you conceive — however far into the future — a time when there will be free elections in Cuba?” Not waiting for his interpreter, “Guevara broke into laughter at my naively ignorant question. He made it clear that I had no understanding of a true people’s revolution, firmly guided by Maximum Leader Castro.”
If the Cuban Communists were sponsored by the central bankers, how do I account for the CIA’s Bay of Pigs? This probably was designed to fail to enhance Castro’s image and reinforce the Hegelian dialectic. If the US could go to Vietnam “for the sake of democracy,” it could certainty have invaded Cuba ofcially. This opened the door for the missile crisis and the assassination of Kennedy, both part of the agenda.
How do I account for the CIA’s killing of Guevara? He had served his purpose and was worth more as a martyr.
Conclusion
The Rothschilds and Rockefellers must be laughing up their sleeves at all the young rebels who look to Che Guevara as a hero and symbol of equality. In fact, Communism is about the total concentration of all wealth in the hands of the central bankers. In theory, it is “public” but in fact, they own and control the State.
Guevara helped establish a Communist regime in Cuba that may be a harbinger for Obama’s America. Yes, the people are all equal — dirt poor. Yes, they get free education and health care but education is indoctrination and people cannot toil for nothing if they are sick.
Essentially you have a prosperous island in which all the wealth seems to flow to the Communists and their sponsors. People work for pittance. Secret police are everywhere and no one can say a word against the regime.
This is where we are heading when we tolerate a government full of New World Orderlies (Communists) and movies that venerate their ruthless agents.
Wealth in the hands of central bankers. Communism? I think that Wall Street calls it unregulated Capitalism. Also knowm as the “Free Market”. Christians call it “God loves you”.
Well Batista wasn’t a saint either,I’d choose Che over him any day.Communism in my opinion is a good idea.The wealth and resources of a country used for the common good of the people.I mean look at China,they’re becoming an economic superpower.Our bankers in Ireland were transfering millions into their accounts,crippling the nation economically from within.Our bankers boasted saying “we the Irish are the 2nd richest people on earth”look at us now.That’s capitalism for you.